Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of situational and behavior description interview questions for higher-level positions

  • Allen I. Huffcutt
  • , Jeff A. Weekley
  • , Willi H. Wiesner
  • , Timothy Degroot
  • , Casey Jones
  • Bradley University
  • Kenexa
  • Department of Psychology McMaster University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

77 Scopus citations

Abstract

Based on a study of federal investigative agents, Pulakos and Schmitt (1995) hypothesized that situational interviews are less effective for higher-level positions than behavior description interviews. To evaluate their hypothesis we analyzed data from 2 new structured interview studies. Both of these studies involved higher-level positions, a military officer and a district manager respectively, and had matching SI and BDI questions written to assess the same job characteristics. Results confirmed that situational interviews are much less predictive of performance in these types of positions. Moreover, results indicated very little correspondence between situational and behavior description questions written to assess the same job characteristic, and a link between BDI ratings and the personality trait Extroversion. Possible reasons for the lower situational interview effectiveness are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)619-644
Number of pages26
JournalPersonnel Psychology
Volume54
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

Cite this