TY - JOUR
T1 - Constraining carbon and sulfur dynamics in Lake Erie nearshore waters: A chemical and isotopic reconnaissance study
AU - Yuan, Fasong
AU - DiBiasio, Emilia
AU - Mayer, Bernhard
AU - Guo, Laodong
PY - 2023/10/1
Y1 - 2023/10/1
N2 - Past studies have documented contrasting geochemical responses of the Great Lakes to anthropogenic disturbances of the carbon and sulfur cycles. Yet, it is unclear whether these responses were induced by differences in tributary inputs or different behaviors controlled by in-lake biogeochemical processes. To yield insight into the carbon and sulfur dynamics across the land-lake interface, concentrations of chloride (Cl-), sulfate (SO42-), dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) were measured in water samples from nearshore and offshore sites at Lake Erie, the Detroit River, and other tributaries. The stable isotope ratios of water (δ18O and δ2H), sulfate (δ34SSO4 and δ18OSO4), and the stable and radio isotope ratios of DIC (δ13CDIC and Δ14CDIC) were also measured. Our results confirm that waters from Lake Erie characterized by low Cl- and SO42-, low deuterium excess (d-excess = δ2H – 8 δ18O), and high δ13CDIC, Δ14CDIC, δ34SSO4, and δ18OSO4, were chemically and isotopically different from tributary waters. The nearshore waters exhibited significant correlations between various pairs of chemical and isotopic parameters revealing the influence of inputs from the tributaries. Moreover, the nearshore waters had lower averages of Cl-, SO42-, DOC, DIC, and δ18O, but higher averages of δ13CDIC, Δ14CDIC, and δ34SSO4 than those estimated from binary mixing between lake and tributary waters, suggesting an effect of in-lake biogeochemical transformations. But the rates of carbon and sulfur transformations differed considerably. Thus, we suggest that the contrasting geochemical responses were induced by both their different in-lake transformation rates and their different histories of tributary inputs.
AB - Past studies have documented contrasting geochemical responses of the Great Lakes to anthropogenic disturbances of the carbon and sulfur cycles. Yet, it is unclear whether these responses were induced by differences in tributary inputs or different behaviors controlled by in-lake biogeochemical processes. To yield insight into the carbon and sulfur dynamics across the land-lake interface, concentrations of chloride (Cl-), sulfate (SO42-), dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) were measured in water samples from nearshore and offshore sites at Lake Erie, the Detroit River, and other tributaries. The stable isotope ratios of water (δ18O and δ2H), sulfate (δ34SSO4 and δ18OSO4), and the stable and radio isotope ratios of DIC (δ13CDIC and Δ14CDIC) were also measured. Our results confirm that waters from Lake Erie characterized by low Cl- and SO42-, low deuterium excess (d-excess = δ2H – 8 δ18O), and high δ13CDIC, Δ14CDIC, δ34SSO4, and δ18OSO4, were chemically and isotopically different from tributary waters. The nearshore waters exhibited significant correlations between various pairs of chemical and isotopic parameters revealing the influence of inputs from the tributaries. Moreover, the nearshore waters had lower averages of Cl-, SO42-, DOC, DIC, and δ18O, but higher averages of δ13CDIC, Δ14CDIC, and δ34SSO4 than those estimated from binary mixing between lake and tributary waters, suggesting an effect of in-lake biogeochemical transformations. But the rates of carbon and sulfur transformations differed considerably. Thus, we suggest that the contrasting geochemical responses were induced by both their different in-lake transformation rates and their different histories of tributary inputs.
KW - Binary mixing model
KW - Dissolved Organic and Inorganic Carbon
KW - Great Lakes
KW - Nearshore Lake Erie
KW - Radiocarbon
KW - Stable isotopes
KW - Sulfate
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85165638033&origin=inward
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85165638033&origin=inward
U2 - 10.1016/j.jglr.2023.07.005
DO - 10.1016/j.jglr.2023.07.005
M3 - Article
SN - 0380-1330
VL - 49
SP - 1123
EP - 1136
JO - Journal of Great Lakes Research
JF - Journal of Great Lakes Research
IS - 5
ER -