Land-use Controls, Fiscal Zoning, and the Local Provision of Education

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Considerable prior analysis has gone into the study of zoning restrictions on locational choice and on fiscal burdens, but none addresses the level and distribution of public goods provided under fiscal zoning. Our analysis emphasizes the interplay between land-use restrictions and public good provision, focusing on schooling outcomes. We extend existing general equilibrium models of location and the provision of education so that fiscal zoning can be put into Tiebout choice. Some households create a fiscal burden, motivating the use of exclusionary land-use controls by local governments. We then analyze the market effects of different land-use controls (minimum lot size [MLS] zoning, local public finance with a head tax, and growth restrictions through fringe zoning) and demonstrate how household behavior directly affects the equilibrium outcomes and the provision of the local public good.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)559-585
Number of pages27
JournalPublic Finance Review
Volume43
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 14 2015

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 15 - Life on Land
    SDG 15 Life on Land

Keywords

  • tiebout model
  • urban location model
  • zoning

Cite this