Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Mayoral leadership and facilitative governance

  • Vera D Vogelsang-Coombs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

This analysis offers a contingency model of mayoral leadership based on a long view of a city's institutional context and substantive interests. This model generates four distinct governance types or styles of mayoral administration - populism, progressivism, constitutionalism, and managerialism. The author uses empirical evidence drawn from familiar mayoral administrations to analyze shifts within and across these governance types. By integrating normative public administration into the dynamics of urban governance, this model yields robust findings concerning mayoral-regime relationships. The author concludes that the renewal of a fiscally stressed big city is in facilitative governance. Facilitative governance blends managerialism and constitutionalism, whereas its normative basis is democratic conservatorship. By activating the ethos of public administration, a mayoral conservator facilitates the regime conditions necessary for economic, political, and social inclusion. © 2007 Sage Publications.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)198-225
Number of pages28
JournalAmerican Review of Public Administration
Volume37
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2007

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities
    SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities

Keywords

  • Atlanta
  • Chicago
  • Cleveland
  • Indianapolis
  • Mayoral leadership
  • Regime politics

Cite this