Abstract
Active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) was originally given in a nonlinear gain structure to better accommodate the dynamic uncertainties and disturbances. However, the resulting complexity in a theoretical analysis and in the parameter tuning inhibits the applications of an ADRC. ADRC was linearized and parameterized for a practical convenience. Since linear ADRC (LADRC) and nonlinear ADRC (NLADRC) each has its own advantages and disadvantages, choosing between LADRC and NLADRC is rather difficult. As a matter of fact, there is a lack of quantitative analysis and comparison between LADRC and NLADRC. This paper first gives an easy solution in the parameter tuning of the nonlinear extended state observer, followed by a quantitative analysis and comparison study on LADRC and NLADRC; then, an LADRC/NLADRC switching control (SADRC) scheme is proposed and its stability is analyzed; finally, the SADRC scheme is verified by experiment using the ball-beam platform. The proposed SADRC takes the advantage of the additional performance improvement associated with the NLADRC, but make it easier to use.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 7572134 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1425-1435 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics |
| Volume | 64 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 1 2017 |
Keywords
- Active disturbance rejection control (ADRC)
- extended state observer
- parameter tuning
- stability analysis
- switching control
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver