Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Simulating subject-specific aortic hemodynamic effects of valvular lesions in rheumatic heart disease

  • Hannah L. Cebull
  • , Olukayode O. Aremu
  • , Radhika S. Kulkarni
  • , Samuel X. Zhang
  • , Petronella Samuels
  • , Stephen Jermy
  • , Ntobeko A.B. Ntusi
  • , Craig J. Goergen
  • Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering
  • Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town
  • Emory University School of Medicine
  • University of Cape Town
  • South African Medical Research Council
  • Indiana University School of Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is a neglected tropical disease despite the substantial global health burden. In this study, we aimed to develop a lower cost method of modeling aortic blood flow using subject-specific velocity profiles, aiding our understanding of RHD's consequences on the structure and function of the ascending aorta. Echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) are often used for diagnosis, including valve dysfunction assessments. However, there is a need to further characterize aortic valve lesions to improve treatment options and timing for patients, while using accessible and affordable imaging strategies. Here, we simulated effects of RHD aortic valve lesions on the aorta using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). We hypothesized that inlet velocity distribution and wall shear stress (WSS) will differ between RHD and non-RHD individuals, as well as between subject-specific and standard Womersley velocity profiles. Phase-contrast CMR data from South Africa of six RHD subjects with aortic stenosis and/or regurgitation and six matched controls were used to estimate subject-specific velocity inlet profiles and the mean velocity for Womersley profiles. Our findings were twofold. First, we found WSS in subject-specific RHD was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than control subject simulations, while Womersley simulation groups did not differ. Second, evaluating spatial velocity differences (SV) between simulation types revealed that simulations of RHD had significantly higher SV than non-RHD (p < 0.05), these results highlight the need for implementing subject-specific input into RHD CFD, which we demonstrate how to accomplish through accessible methods.
Original languageEnglish
Article number111002
JournalJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
Volume145
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2023

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Cite this