TY - JOUR
T1 - SME response to major exogenous shocks: The bright and dark sides of business model pivoting
AU - Morgan, Todd Alan
AU - Anokhin, Sergey
AU - Ofstein, Laurel
AU - Friske, Wesley
PY - 2020/8/1
Y1 - 2020/8/1
N2 - Within this short commentary, we explore the notion of pivoting; following major exogenous shocks, firms often contemplate business model pivoting where they change product or service offerings to capitalise on emerging opportunities. We assess the potential bright and dark sides of pivoting for new and existing firms in regard to quality of opportunities, fit with current capabilities and potential costs. The extant literature suggests that two forms of opportunities exist, arbitrage and innovation. We discern that post-shock, new firms may be better positioned to pursue arbitrage opportunities, whereas existing firms should target innovation. Existing firms may have more complications when pursuing arbitrage due to resource embeddedness and stakeholder obligations, and have a greater ability to innovate with an established resource base. Conversely, new firms can capitalise on arbitrage due to lack of embeddedness, as arbitrage requires a significant investment in opportunity selection. In addition, we offer suggestions for future research in regard to the current pandemic and more broadly, exogenous shocks.
AB - Within this short commentary, we explore the notion of pivoting; following major exogenous shocks, firms often contemplate business model pivoting where they change product or service offerings to capitalise on emerging opportunities. We assess the potential bright and dark sides of pivoting for new and existing firms in regard to quality of opportunities, fit with current capabilities and potential costs. The extant literature suggests that two forms of opportunities exist, arbitrage and innovation. We discern that post-shock, new firms may be better positioned to pursue arbitrage opportunities, whereas existing firms should target innovation. Existing firms may have more complications when pursuing arbitrage due to resource embeddedness and stakeholder obligations, and have a greater ability to innovate with an established resource base. Conversely, new firms can capitalise on arbitrage due to lack of embeddedness, as arbitrage requires a significant investment in opportunity selection. In addition, we offer suggestions for future research in regard to the current pandemic and more broadly, exogenous shocks.
KW - arbitrage
KW - business model pivoting
KW - exogenous shocks
KW - innovation
KW - opportunity selection
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85086943948&origin=inward
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85086943948&origin=inward
U2 - 10.1177/0266242620936590
DO - 10.1177/0266242620936590
M3 - Article
SN - 0266-2426
VL - 38
SP - 369
EP - 379
JO - International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship
JF - International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship
IS - 5
ER -