Abstract
Performance budgeting is a contentious area in public administration literature. While performance budgeting systems are widely adopted with promises of better fiscal outcomes, public administration theory implies that this practice may generate social waste. Most empirical research that finds null or negative effects of performance budgeting focuses only on how performance budgeting affects resource allocations and cost savings. This study aims to fill the gap in the literature by conducting a quantitative panel-data analysis to determine whether the inclusion of performance information in municipal budgets contributes to better fiscal outcomes. An ordered logit regression analysis in the context of 125 large U.S. cities over a 12-year span (2008–2019) demonstrates that performance budgeting is positively associated with municipal fiscal health.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 871-889 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Public Performance and Management Review |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1 2023 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Keywords
- Administration of public services
- credit ratings
- performance budgeting
- performance management
- public budgeting
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver