The Bureaucratic Burden of Identifying your Rapist and Remaining “Cooperative”: What the Sexual Assault Kit Initiative Tells us about Sexual Assault Case Attrition and Outcomes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

We analyzed a large sample of sexual assaults over almost two decades in one urban U.S. jurisdiction with previously untested sexual assault kits that were initially not successfully adjudicated (n = 717). We explored patterns of attrition through descriptive statistics and predictors of attrition through continuation-ratio modeling. Findings provide a more comprehensive framework for examining attrition, exploring the bureaucratic burden placed on victims to identify who sexually assaulted them and to remain engaged in an often harmful process and system. Implications suggest this burden could be eased via increased trauma-informed victim support and protocols and increased use of forensic evidence.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)528-553
Number of pages26
JournalAmerican Journal of Criminal Justice
Volume46
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2021

Keywords

  • Bureaucratic burden
  • Case attrition
  • Case outcome
  • Rape kit
  • Sexual assault
  • Sexual assault kit

Cite this