The Court-Packing Controversy (reviewing Jeff Shesol, Supreme Power:Franklin Roosevelt vs. the Supreme Court (2010)),28 Constitutional Commentary 451 (2013)

Sheldon Gelman

The Court-Packing Controversy (reviewing Jeff Shesol, Supreme Power:Franklin Roosevelt vs. the Supreme Court (2010)),28 Constitutional Commentary 451 (2013)

Sheldon Gelman

Law College

Research output: Other contribution

Abstract

The Court-Packing Controversey is a nearly 25,000 word article that attempts to reconceptualize a major historical debate. Constitutional Commentaryl is currently ranked by the Washington & Lee Law Library as the #1 peer reviewed legal journal in the United States.

Original language	English
Volume	June (approx)
State	Published - 2013

Publication series

Name	Constitutional Commentary

Cite this

@misc{776b8e6a864648148a439d044c086a8e,

title = "The Court-Packing Controversy (reviewing Jeff Shesol, Supreme Power:Franklin Roosevelt vs. the Supreme Court (2010)),28 Constitutional Commentary 451 (2013)",

abstract = "The Court-Packing Controversey is a nearly 25,000 word article that attempts to reconceptualize a major historical debate. Constitutional Commentaryl is currently ranked by the Washington \& Lee Law Library as the \#1 peer reviewed legal journal in the United States.",

author = "Sheldon Gelman",

year = "2013",

language = "English",

volume = "June (approx)",

series = "Constitutional Commentary",

type = "Other",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - The Court-Packing Controversy (reviewing Jeff Shesol, Supreme Power:Franklin Roosevelt vs. the Supreme Court (2010)),28 Constitutional Commentary 451 (2013)

AU - Gelman, Sheldon

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The Court-Packing Controversey is a nearly 25,000 word article that attempts to reconceptualize a major historical debate. Constitutional Commentaryl is currently ranked by the Washington & Lee Law Library as the #1 peer reviewed legal journal in the United States.

AB - The Court-Packing Controversey is a nearly 25,000 word article that attempts to reconceptualize a major historical debate. Constitutional Commentaryl is currently ranked by the Washington & Lee Law Library as the #1 peer reviewed legal journal in the United States.

M3 - Other contribution

VL - June (approx)

T3 - Constitutional Commentary

ER -