TY - JOUR
T1 - The Relevance of Informant Discrepancies for the Assessment of Adolescent Personality Pathology
AU - Tackett, Jennifer L.
AU - Herzhoff, Kathrin
AU - Reardon, Kathleen W.
AU - Smack, Avante J.
AU - Kushner, Shauna C.
PY - 2013/12/1
Y1 - 2013/12/1
N2 - In this article, we compare the nature and function of self-parent informant discrepancies for adolescent personality pathology using two methods: standard difference scores (SDS) and polynomial regressions. In total, 489 11- to 18-year-old youth (54% female) and their parents reported on youth personality pathology traits and general psychopathology. Findings supported convergence and divergence in parent- and self-reports. Potential utility of informant discrepancies also emerged, such that discrepancies on trait disagreeableness and trait compulsivity predicted youth externalizing problems using the SDS approach and the polynomial regression approach; however, the polynomial regression approach yielded a more complex and nuanced characterization of informant discrepancies than did the SDS approach. Taken together, these results suggest that polynomial regressions may provide a more comprehensive picture regarding the meaning and utility of informant discrepancies. © 2013 American Psychological Association. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc., on behalf of the American Psychological Association.
AB - In this article, we compare the nature and function of self-parent informant discrepancies for adolescent personality pathology using two methods: standard difference scores (SDS) and polynomial regressions. In total, 489 11- to 18-year-old youth (54% female) and their parents reported on youth personality pathology traits and general psychopathology. Findings supported convergence and divergence in parent- and self-reports. Potential utility of informant discrepancies also emerged, such that discrepancies on trait disagreeableness and trait compulsivity predicted youth externalizing problems using the SDS approach and the polynomial regression approach; however, the polynomial regression approach yielded a more complex and nuanced characterization of informant discrepancies than did the SDS approach. Taken together, these results suggest that polynomial regressions may provide a more comprehensive picture regarding the meaning and utility of informant discrepancies. © 2013 American Psychological Association. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc., on behalf of the American Psychological Association.
KW - Adolescent personality pathology
KW - Assessment
KW - Externalizing problems
KW - Informant discrepancies
KW - Internalizing problems
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84889649135&origin=inward
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84889649135&origin=inward
U2 - 10.1111/cpsp.12048
DO - 10.1111/cpsp.12048
M3 - Article
SN - 0969-5893
VL - 20
SP - 378
EP - 392
JO - Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice
JF - Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice
IS - 4
ER -