TY - JOUR
T1 - Validation of Instruments for Measuring Affective Outcomes in Gifted Education
AU - Callahan, Carolyn M.
AU - Azano, Amy Price
AU - Park, Sunhee
AU - Brodersen, Annalissa V.
AU - Caughey, Melanie
AU - Bass, Erika L.
AU - Amspaugh, Christina M.
PY - 2020/11/1
Y1 - 2020/11/1
N2 - With increasing attention to examining cognitive strengths and achievements related to social and emotional variables, it is imperative that instruments developed and used to assess change be valid and reliable for measuring underlying constructs. This study examines instruments identified and/or developed to measure four noncognitive constructs (i.e., student engagement, self-efficacy, growth mindset, and stereotype threat) as outcome variables in a study with elementary-aged students in high-poverty rural communities. The process of creating and examining the psychometric properties of these instruments is a necessary step in documenting the usefulness of the instruments not just in our study but also in other studies with elementary students. We note in our descriptions of the development and assessment of measures that underlying factors may or may not parallel those identified in the general population or in older students and that measurement of noncognitive variables in the population of young gifted students requires considerable attention.
AB - With increasing attention to examining cognitive strengths and achievements related to social and emotional variables, it is imperative that instruments developed and used to assess change be valid and reliable for measuring underlying constructs. This study examines instruments identified and/or developed to measure four noncognitive constructs (i.e., student engagement, self-efficacy, growth mindset, and stereotype threat) as outcome variables in a study with elementary-aged students in high-poverty rural communities. The process of creating and examining the psychometric properties of these instruments is a necessary step in documenting the usefulness of the instruments not just in our study but also in other studies with elementary students. We note in our descriptions of the development and assessment of measures that underlying factors may or may not parallel those identified in the general population or in older students and that measurement of noncognitive variables in the population of young gifted students requires considerable attention.
KW - affective outcomes
KW - assessment
KW - gifted
KW - reliability
KW - validity
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85086844260&origin=inward
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85086844260&origin=inward
U2 - 10.1177/1932202X20929963
DO - 10.1177/1932202X20929963
M3 - Article
SN - 1932-202X
VL - 31
SP - 470
EP - 505
JO - Journal of Advanced Academics
JF - Journal of Advanced Academics
IS - 4
ER -