Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

What makes a cyanobacterial bloom disappear? A review of the abiotic and biotic cyanobacterial bloom loss factors

  • Ted D. Harris
  • , Kaitlin L. Reinl
  • , Marzi Azarderakhsh
  • , Stella A. Berger
  • , Manuel Castro Berman
  • , Mina Bizic
  • , Ruchi Bhattacharya
  • , Sarah H. Burnet
  • , Jacob A. Cianci-Gaskill
  • , Lisette N. de Senerpont Domis
  • , Inge Elfferich
  • , K. Ali Ger
  • , Hans-Peter F. Grossart
  • , Bas W. Ibelings
  • , Danny Ionescu
  • , Zohreh Mazaheri Kouhanestani
  • , Jonas Mauch
  • , Yvonne R. McElarney
  • , Veronica Nava
  • , Rebecca L. North
  • Igor Ogashawara, Ma. Cristina A. Paule-Mercado, Sara Soria-Píriz, Xinyu Sun, Jessica V. Trout-Haney, Gesa A. Weyhenmeyer, Kiyoko Yokota, Qing Zhan
  • University of Kansas
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • New York City College of Technology
  • Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries
  • Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
  • University of Idaho
  • Ohio Department of Natural Resources
  • Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW)
  • University of Twente
  • Cardiff University
  • Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
  • Potsdam University
  • University of Geneva
  • University of Missouri
  • Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Belfast
  • University of Milano-Bicocca
  • Institute of Hydrobiology, Biology Centre of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic
  • Université du Québec à Montréal
  • Michigan State University
  • Dartmouth College
  • Uppsala University
  • State University of New York at Oneonta

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

54 Scopus citations

Abstract

Cyanobacterial blooms present substantial challenges to managers and threaten ecological and public health. Although the majority of cyanobacterial bloom research and management focuses on factors that control bloom initiation, duration, toxicity, and geographical extent, relatively little research focuses on the role of loss processes in blooms and how these processes are regulated. Here, we define a loss process in terms of population dynamics as any process that removes cells from a population, thereby decelerating or reducing the development and extent of blooms. We review abiotic (e.g., hydraulic flushing and oxidative stress/UV light) and biotic factors (e.g., allelopathic compounds, infections, grazing, and resting cells/programmed cell death) known to govern bloom loss. We found that the dominant loss processes depend on several system specific factors including cyanobacterial genera-specific traits, in situ physicochemical conditions, and the microbial, phytoplankton, and consumer community composition. We also address loss processes in the context of bloom management and discuss perspectives and challenges in predicting how a changing climate may directly and indirectly affect loss processes on blooms. A deeper understanding of bloom loss processes and their underlying mechanisms may help to mitigate the negative consequences of cyanobacterial blooms and improve current management strategies.
Original languageEnglish
Article number102599
JournalHarmful Algae
Volume133
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • cell death
  • cyanobacteria
  • grazing
  • HABs
  • loss processes
  • sedimentation

Cite this